is plos climate a good journal

This wealth of original research has been accompanied by a series of timely Reviews, and by thoughtfully-written Opinions that have addressed current issues in climate science, policy and practice, and identified priorities for future research. Finally, despite the difficulty of surveying people about their attitudes towards other kinds of policiesincluding some that may require explanationwe need to know more about public receptivity to them. Yes This paper begins with a discussion of attitudes towards environmental policies generally. In other countries, there is less correlation between ideology and climate beliefs [10,11], and the association with political ideology varies cross-nationallyespecially for peoples willingness to pay an economic price for the sake of better reducing environmental harms [21]. Next, the paper discusses public views of carbon taxes specifically, and ways of making carbon taxes more appealing. Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm, Sweden, For manuscript inquiries, email the journal office. The surprising upside of climate migration | The Economist Contrary to widespread impressions, even most Americans accept climate change is real [24,25]. The handling Academic Editor is usually a member of the PLOS Climate Editorial Board, but occasionally a Guest Editor is invited to serve instead. Sharing peer review history enriches the scientific record, increases transparency and accountability, and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the thoroughness of the peer review process it has undergone. Voluntarily refraining from engaging in such behaviors would entail some self-denial. The journal reserves the right not to publish peer review history in special cases, for example, due to an ethical consideration, such as the inclusion of information about a vulnerable population. Yes All PLOS journals adhere to the highest standards of rigorous peer review and research ethics. Aside from the question of what types of policies laypeople prefer, there are variable features of given policies that may affect their popularity, plus different kinds of framing and messaging. In contrast to more closed publication models, openness inspires how we think about science and publishing. Experiments also confirm that costs are off-putting [41]. Visit our homepage for the latest studies from the PLOS Climate community. e0000170. Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work. The editor may make a new decision based on their own assessment of the revised manuscript and yourresponseto reviewers, or request additional input from external peer reviewers. (Even more contentious proposals may include carbon tariffs on imported goods; new nuclear power stations; and the complete elimination of fossil fuel industries in some areas.). People who are vehicle-dependent and rural are most opposed to carbon taxes [49]. In general, though, public concern is high. It is also demonstrated by instances in which a strong public backlash has led to the withdrawal of proposals for new climate policies. This is contrary to a logic of collective action in which it is pointless for any one jurisdiction to make efforts on its own. More trusting people are more supportive of environmental protection and environmental policies generally [6163]. Key to this is a robust, objective peer review process. We are highly supportive of preprinting, and encourage authors to explore the advantages of preprints alongside peer-reviewed publication. To boldly grow: five new journals shaped by Open Science In one study [51], found people most supportive of reducing subsidies for fossil fuels and directing them towards sustainable energy sources instead. PLOS Climate is a peer reviewed scientific journal with a rigorous editorial screening and assessment process made up of several stages. PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, based in San Francisco, California, US. Our policies on data sharing (https://journals.plos.org/climate/s/data-availability) and code sharing (https://journals.plos.org/climate/s/materials-software-and-code-sharing#loc-sharing-code) support the reuse of these materials for further analyses or reinterpretation, accelerating overall progress in climate research, as well as promoting reproducibility. No, PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, based in San Francisco, California, US, Corrections, Expressions of Concern, and Retractions, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000015, https://journals.plos.org/climate/s/criteria-for-publication, https://plos.org/resources/global-equity-model/, https://journals.plos.org/climate/s/best-practices-in-research-reporting#loc-inclusivity-in-global-research, https://journals.plos.org/climate/s/data-availability, https://journals.plos.org/climate/s/materials-software-and-code-sharing#loc-sharing-code, http://www.planetaryhealthalliance.org/sao-paulo-declaration, https://library.wmo.int/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=21982#.Ya-SItDP1PY, https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-the-lack-of-diversity-in-climate-science-research, https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/climate-change-scientists-list/. No, Is the Subject Area "Open science" applicable to this article? There will be challenges and changes along the way, but we will stick to our mission and will be ready to be held accountable as we earn researchers trust as a venue for their work. PLOS journals publicly acknowledge the indispensable efforts of our editors and reviewers on an annual basis. Tell us about your research. PLOS Climate | LinkedIn These studies show how environmental concern may not translate into support for environmental solutions. The journal staff and in-house editorial team perform an initial quality check to identify potential issues such as: Submissions may be returned to authors for changes or clarifications at this stage. Around the world, most people are aware of the problem of climate change, believe it is anthropogenic, and feel concerned about its potential consequences. But that minority has received more attention than its modest size perhaps warrants. This has been most clear when initiatives for mitigation efforts have been defeated by public referenda or elections. There is an urgent need for more research on public attitudes towards policies for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. The externalities driving environmental problems are not necessarily well understood by many members of the public either. For full functionality of this site, please enable JavaScript. Attitudes towards carbon taxation and perhaps other policies depend on political trust. No, Is the Subject Area "Systematic reviews" applicable to this article? Our project is part of a growing field interested in extramedullary hematopoiesis in adult animals and contributes to a wider appreciation of the relevance of extramedullary . HSV is a human pathogen that lytically infects cells of the epidermis. Survey questions about environmental taxes have consequently been asked for many years, including in general-purpose (rather than climate- or environment-specific) surveys. That is, rather than disliking environmental taxes because they believe their ineffective, people come to believe that environmental taxes are ineffective after they already dislike them. The editor reviews the manuscript against our publication criteria and determines whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. We will continue to prioritise making PLOS Climate a truly inclusive home for research from all regions. , charting a new path towards equity, diversity and inclusion in global health. PLOS Climate unites experimental, theoretical, observational, technological, behavioral and socio-economic research from all regions of the world to tackle the challenges of a changing climate at a global scale. Competing interests: JM is the Executive Editor of PLOS Climate. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000170. This perspective predicts that environment concern should reflect societal affluence, with concern noticeably lower in poorer countries. Open Access is not truly open without easy and equitable opportunities to publish. Presumably at some point they have to. From a psychological perspective, which focuses on individuals voluntary, altruistic actions, private environmental behaviors are influenced by peoples values. Introduction. Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions, economic pressures, and stretched energy systems have been increasingly . As we position PLOS Climate as a venue for the assessment and dissemination of potential solutions to era-defining planetary challenges, we could not have ignored the vital connections between climate and health, water, and sustainability. Earmarking could perhaps be used to good effect with taxes on air travel [80]. Looking ahead, we have a busy calendar of activities planned for this year, and we are setting ambitious goals to keep our sights set on delivering against PLOS Climates important mission. More research is urgently needed about how to appeal to people who are otherwise opposed to climate policies. Discover journal updates, explore new offerings, and more below. The journal has received the submission and is conducting an initial editorial assessment and screening for technical requirements. The peer review history package includes the complete editorial decision letter for each revision, with reviews, and your responses to reviewer comments, including attachments. Yes PLOS Climate considers original research articles from all disciplines within the journal's scope in the natural sciences, medical research, engineering, as well as the related social sciences and humanities. PLOS Climate Many people are unaware of the consensus, but those who are aware are far more likely to accept climate science and to support policy action to address climate change [8688]. A range of studies have yielded some insights into the reasons why so many people are skeptical about climate policies, particularly carbon pricing, and what strategies can make such policies more acceptable. Call for Papers: Gender and Adaptation in the Global South . It has been a privilege to connect with researchers and practitioners working across the climate space at conferences, through visits to institutions and online events, and to hear direct from them how we can best meet their needs. The dramatic impacts of climate change on the earth systems, including extreme weather events, continue to manifest [ 1 ]. All this notwithstanding, is also important to recognize that some studies caution against too much faith in the benefits of providing people with more information. No, Is the Subject Area "Peer review" applicable to this article? This is especially the case for residents of lower-income and/or non-Western nations. This relationship will open new opportunities for authors submitting to PLOS Climate,PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, andPLOS Waterto post preprints with ease. However, bark beetle impacts have become increasingly extensive and intense, apparently associated with climate change. Why are peoples attitudes about taxation different to those about responding to the problem of climate change generically? Authors are strongly encouraged to share their research on a preprint server and to provide . Yes It has been a turbulent year for the global climate on many levels. Certain kinds of technology mandates and public supports for innovation are also likely to play an important role in deep decarbonization [97], yet we know little about public opinion towards them either. Handling Reassignments; Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Studies; Contact. As [53] emphasize, the perceived rather than actual costs of different policies are likely shaping attitudes, and the fact that some studies investigating public opinion on climate policies do not explicitly state the personal costs of a policy may result in a bias towards overly favourable responses. That may explain why pull measures (such as subsidies and information) are more popular than push measures (restrictions and taxes). In general, people tend to see climate change as more of a threat to others than to themselves [40]. In this inaugural Editorial, PLOS Global Public Health Editors-in-Chief Catherine Kyobutungi and Madhukar Pai and Executive Editor Julia Robinson lay out the ambitious vision for the journal. And this has been true for as long as social scientists have been studying public environmental attitudes. Youll have 45 days to resubmit the revised manuscript for both a major or a minor revision. And the very reason environmental problems exist is becauseat least given the existing technology, laws, and institutionsindividuals benefit more than they pay for engaging in polluting behaviors. . 2022 BY THE NUMBERS 134 Published authors 49 Published articles 3,969 Total mentions PLOS Global Public Health. How to build more such trust is not clear, especially as corruption and abuses of power are very effective in undermining it, and ridding countries of these things is difficult. PLOS Climate Everything we publish is: Even if peoples skepticism is alleviated, then, that does not substantially raise support.
Lake Shore Baseball Tournament, 2418 N Main St Flagstaff Az 86004, Whitman Baseball Schedule 2023, Articles I